Startseite   |  Site map   |  A-Z artikel   |  Artikel einreichen   |   Kontakt   |  
    Themen der Chemie
    Deutsch online artikel
    Englisch / Englische
    Mathematik / Studium
    Wirtschaft & Technik



philosophie artikel (Interpretation und charakterisierung)

The marxism

Marxism was developed in the middle of the 19th century by Karl Marx and, to a lesser extent, by Friedrich Engels. With time the content of Marxism changed, because other philosopher like Lenin and Stalin added their oppinion to the thoughts of Marx. Originally it is consisted of three main interrelated ideas: a philosophical view of man, a theory of history and an economic and political program.
The point of departure of human history is living man, who seeks to satisfy certain primary needs:

\"Man is first of all a natural being. ...the ojects of
his instincts exist outside him, independent of him,
but the objects of his need, indispensable and essential
for the realization and confirmation of his substantial
powers.\" (Economic and Philosophic Manuscripts of 1844)

Every human has various needs he tries to satisfy. This satisfaction opens the way to more and new needs. Human activity is essentially a struggle with nature that must furnish man the means of satisfying his needs: food, drink, clothing and then the development of his intellectual and artistic abilities. In this undertaking, man discovers himself as a productive being who humanizes himself by his labor. Furthermore, man humanizes nature while he naturalizes himself. By his labor he realizes his identity with the nature he masters, while at the same time he recieves free consciousness. Born of nature man becomes fully human by opposing it. By appropriating all the creative energies, he discovers that \"all that is called history is nothing else than the process of creating man through human labor\". Fully naturalized, man recaptured his full liberty.
Another basic element that is appears in Marxism is alienation. Living in an capitalistic society man feels not really free. He is an alienated being; he is not home in his world. The causes of alienatien come to have an increasingly economic and social content. The more the worker produces the less he consumes and the more values he creates the more he devalues himself, because his product and his labor are estranged from him. The life of the worker depends on capital: no work, no pay. Under these conditions, labor denies the fullnes of concrete man. \"The genetic being of man is transformed into a being which is alien to him.\" Alienated labor is seen as the consequence of market product, the division of labor and the divison of society into antagonistic classes. In Marxism the people are prevented form alienation, because everybody works not for himself but for society.
In Marx\'s ideas of a perfect economical system, the economy was seen a a whole and not in one or another of its aspects. In the book \'Das Kapital\' he analyzes the economy of the 19th century in England to develop a better market system. It is a system of private enterprise and competition that arose in the 16th century from the development of sea routes, international trade and colonialism. Its rise had been facilitated by changes like division of labor and the concentration of workshops. The wealth of society that brought this economy into play had been acquired through an \"enormous accumulation of commodities\". If the capitalist advances funds to buy cotton yarn with which to produce fabrics and sell the prodoct for a larger sum than he paid, he is able to invest the difference in additional production. \"Not only is the value advance kept in circulation, but it changes in its magnitude, adds a plus to itself, makes itself worth more, and it is this movement that transforms it into capital.\" The transformation is possible only because the capitalist has appropriated the means of production, including the labor power of the worker. Now the labor power produces more than it is worth. The value of labor power is determined by the amount of labor necessary for its reproduction or, in other words, by the amount needed for the worker to subsist and beget children. But in the hands of the capitalist the labor power employed in the course of a day produces more than the value of the sustenance required by the worker and his family. The difference between the two values is appropriated by the capitalist and it corresponds exactly to the surplus value realized by capitalists in the market. The introduction of machinery is profitable for the individuel capitalist because it enables him to produce more goods at a lower cost, but new techniques are soon taken by his competitors. The outlay for machinery grows faster than the outlay for wages. Since only labor can produce surplus value from which profit is derived, this means that the capitalist\'s rate of profit on his total outlay tends to decline. Along with the declining rate of profit goes an increase in unemployment. The equilibrium of the system is percarious, subject as it is to the internal pressures resulting from its own development. Crisis shake it at regular intervals, preludes to the general crisis that will sweep it away. This instability is increased by the formation of a reserve army of workers, both factory workers and peasants, whose pauperization keeps increasing. \"Capitalist production develops the technique of social production only by exhausting the two sources of wealth: the earth and the worker.\"
Marxism calls itself to be the only economical system to avoid class stuggle. There are two basic classes, which are combined with other less important but similar classes: the class of the owners, or the bourgeoisie and the workers, or the proletariat. \"The bourgeoisie produces its own grave diggers. The fall of the bourgeoisie and the victory of the proletariat are equally inevitable.\" In other words that means that the bourgeoisie is getting richer and richer but most of the residents of this country are getting poorer. Because of this fact they would have to work more, which results in more profit for the bourgeoisie. This struggle of the classes has to end in a switch of society to a communist system.
Russia adopted Marxism as its constitution in the year 1917, when after a revolution, Lenin, who believed in Marx\'s thoughts, came to power. Since then the gouvernment acted in the way of Marxism. Its political system was called Marxism Leninism, a variation of the originall Marxism. After World War II some other countries adopted the same system as Russia and formed a wide society. With the time the economy of all these countries began to collapse. In 1989 the people of East Germany demonstated that they wanted to live in a democratic country, Mikhail Gorbachev, the Russian president opened the borders. Since then most of these countries were more west oriantated and wanted to join the European Union. It will take many years to bring these counties on the same economic level with the U.S.A., Japan or Germany, because all machines are old. Also, power sources are missing or so old that it is impossible to use them. Marx tried to avoid all these problems im his system. The worst mistake he made was that Capitalism does not self destruct.


In my oppinion Democrazy is a better political system than Marxism or similar systems. People in a Democrazy are allowed to say and to do much more than the people in a Marxism society. In both systems the people are allowed to vote, but in a Communist country there is only one party to elect. Another possibility is that the gouvernment tells the people that they live in a Democrazy but in reallity it is a kind Marxist system. When the people go to vote then they can choose between various parties. But all votes against the gouverning party are canceled out. Also the students in school are thought to act in the way of the system and not to get their own oppinion about politics.



Top Themen / Analyse
Die Lehre vom Staat
Spanische Theologie der Renaissance {Neuscholastik)
Jugendlichkeit und Lebensstil
Das alter Griechenland
Holmes Anatomie des Liberalismus
Das Kriterium der Leidensfähigkeit
Eine Untersuchung von Giese & Schmidt


Zum selben thema
A-Z philosophie artikel:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z #

Copyright © 2008 - : ARTIKEL32 | Alle rechte vorbehalten.
Vervielfältigung im Ganzen oder teilweise das Material auf dieser Website gegen das Urheberrecht und wird bestraft, nach dem Gesetz.